The actual transcripts of the call showed that the person who phoned in did NOT identify anyone by race.

On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:

There's an interesting essay on the Gates-Crowley mess on the Associated
Press website by Jesse Washington titled, " Analysis: What they saw
during the Gates arrest".

According to Crowley's police report, the neighbour who called the police told Crawley on the sidewalk outside Gates' house that "she observed what
appeared to be two black men with backpacks on the porch ... her
suspicions were aroused when she observed one of the men wedging his
shoulder into the door".

What Crawley says about this I find striking in this day and age when I
would expect police to be educated in one of the strongest findings of
psychological forensic research.

"Witnesses are inherently reliable," he said later. "She told me what she
saw."

Would the outcome of this unfortunate encounter have been different if
Crowley had known that this belief is not true, that eyewitness testimony
is inherently unreliable?

http://tinyurl.com/n7lunt

Stephen

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus
Bishop's University      e-mail:  [email protected]
2600 College St.
Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Subscribe to discussion list (TIPS) for the teaching of
psychology at http://flightline.highline.edu/sfrantz/tips/
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[email protected]


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to