MIke Smith asked whether there was a bias in the legal system 
that women were less capable of vile acts than men. I said 
"Because it's true?"

On 16 Sep 2009 at 21:27, Don Allen wrote:

> 
> Well no actually. In a previous life I spent about ten years as a
> prison psychologist. I worked in both male and female federal 
> and provincial correctional centres so I have a fair amount of 
> experience to draw on. I can assure you that women have 
> committed acts that were as heinous (and more) than did their 
> male counterparts. 

Interesting, but not the point, or perhaps I misunderstood the 
question.  Women are certainly capable of exceedingly vile acts. 
If the question is merely whether somewhere there is at least 
one woman who has committed a crime as savage as any 
committed by a man,  well, sure. But that's not very useful 
information. 

But the probability that the perpetrator of a horrendous act will 
turn out to be a male rather than a female is very high. Physical 
violence is as common as dirt for males; for women, not so 
much (wish I had some statistics to quote, but I don't, but I'm 
sure they exist). Our prison population of violent offenders is 
mostly male, and I doubt the reason is an unfair legal system 
(more below).

Don's mistake may be in thinking that his observations on a 
prison population are representative of the general population; 
they're not, of course (isn't this the availability heuristic?). If you 
only look underwater, you'd tend to think most life forms were 
fish.

OK, a quick google turns up a New Zealand review of the 
evidence: 
/www.nzfvc.org.nz/PublicationDetails.aspx?publication=14144

They say, with references:

"Men´s rates of general violence consistently exceed those of 
women by a large margin. International research suggests
this holds true across countries, across time and in relation to 
different forms of violence. Despite the differential rates
of reporting and recording violence in different countries and 
sectors of society, most reported violence is perpetrated
by men. The only exceptions to this are closer parity (though not 
equality) between African American men and women,
and child abuse in the home"

"The authors of an international literature review concluded that 
women committed far less violent crime than men, that
violent offending constituted only a small percentage of 
women´s offending, and that the types of offences committed
by women tended to be less serious than those committed by 
men"

Of course, all of this may be explained by a world-wide bias in 
justice systems.  Seems far-fetched to me, especially as legal 
systems are dominated by men, and so would be more likely to 
have a bias in favour of their own sex. Unless someone can 
show otherwise, the statistics appear to be unassailable facts. 
But the interpretation that they are caused by a world-wide legal 
conspiracy against men requires a bit of evidence. no?

(and thanks, Martin B., for your post along the same lines, which 
arrived just as I was polishing this up).

Stephen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.          
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University               
 e-mail:  [email protected]
2600 College St.
Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to