This article suggest to me that the universe is conscious and learns with
procedures
similar to the human brain as proposed by Correlational Opponent Processing.
Ron Blue
>>Stanford University
>>
>>CONTACT: David F. Salisbury, News Service
>>(650) 725-1944; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>1/27/99
>>
>>Did the universe begin as a fractal instead of a big bang?
>>By David F. Salisbury
>>
>>When you think of the beginning of the universe, what image comes to mind?
>>
>>Many people envision it as a rapidly expanding fireball -- the way the "Big
>>Bang" is described in virtually all the college textbooks and popular books
>>published in the United States.
>>
>>But this common conception may be wrong. At least it is being challenged
>>by the latest versions of a theory called inflationary cosmology, which
>>has successfully predicted a number of recent observations regarding the
>>structure of the present-day universe.
>>
>>According to inflationary theory, the universe begins not like an expanding
>>ball of fire but more like a huge growing fractal made up of many inflating
>>balls of space-time that produce new balls that, in turn, produce more new
>>balls, ad infinitum.
>>
>>"The theory is very simple, but we have had a lot of psychological barriers
>>to overcome," said Andrei Linde, a physics professor at Stanford and one of
>>the authors of inflationary cosmology. He summarized the latest thinking on
>>the subject in a session titled "Keys to the Cosmos: The Unification of
>>Particle Physics and Cosmology -- History and Prophecy" at the annual meeting
>>of the American Association for the Advancement of Science on Monday, Jan.
>>25.
>>
>>The standard "big bang" model describes the origin of the universe in terms
>>of a hot, energetic explosion that took place about 15 billion years ago.
>>The theory has been extremely successful in explaining many aspects of the
>>visible universe. It can account for astronomers' discovery that the universe
>>is expanding. It also explains the discovery in the 1960s that a faint and
>>remarkably uniform microwave signal, called the cosmic background radiation,
>>emanates from everywhere in the heavens. This signal has been interpreted as
>>fossil radiation that dates back to a period when the universe was about
>>300,000 years old, the point when the primordial mixture of subatomic
>>particles and radiation cooled to the point that light could travel freely.
>>
>>But there are a number of important questions that the standard big bang
>>model has failed to answer, Linde said. Where did the big bang come from, and
>>what preceded it? Why does the visible universe, which is about 11 billion
>>light years across, appear to be flat rather than curved? Why is the matter
>>in the universe distributed extremely evenly at a very large scale, yet
>>gathered into large clumps called galaxies at a smaller scale?
>>
>>Inflationary theory gives answers to these questions. The underlying idea is
>>elegantly simple. It proposes that the primordial universe underwent a period
>>of rapid, exponential expansion. But the magnitude of this expansion is
>>difficult to grasp. During a period shorter than an eye blink, Linde
>>calculates, a microscopic speck of space would have expanded explosively
>>until it was much larger than the visible universe.
>>
>>Two of the benefits of this theory are immediately apparent. At a very
>>large scale, matter is spread out with remarkable uniformity, departing from
>>perfect homogeneity by less than one part in 10,000. If the visible universe
>>started from a single, tiny volume, this extreme uniformity makes perfect
>>sense. Inflationary theory also predicts that the visible universe should
>>be flat, rather than curved, as suggested by Einstein's theory of general
>>relativity. That is because the inflating universe acts similarly to an
>>expanding balloon. If you pick a small area on the surface of a balloon and
>>then blow it up, the area becomes flatter and flatter. Recent astronomical
>>observations suggest that the universe is as flat as inflationary theory
>>predicts.
>>
>>"It seems that inflation is doing very well, so far," Linde said. "In the
>>last 20 years no other theory has been proposed that can explain the present
>>state of the universe as well."
>>
>>Originally, inflation was thought of as an intermediate stage in the
>>evolution of the universe that could solve a number of problems. One of these
>>problems involves magnetic monopoles, theoretical super-particles possessing
>>only one magnetic pole. According to the standard big bang model, monopoles
>>should have been produced in abundance, but none has ever been found.
>>Inflation solves this problem because exponential expansion would make them
>>exceedingly rare.
>>
>>First inflationary theory introduced
>>
>>The first version of inflationary theory was produced by Alexei A.
>>Starobinsky of the L. D. Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics in Moscow
>>in 1979. Although it created a sensation among Russian astrophysicists, it
>>was quite complicated and did not say much about how inflation could actually
>>start, Linde said.
>>
>>In 1972, Linde and his colleague David Kirzhnits at the P. N. Lebedev Physics
>>Institute in Moscow suggested that the early universe went through a series
>>of phase transitions. As the universe expanded and cooled, it condensed into
>>different forms, much like water vapor becomes liquid water that freezes into
>>ice. In 1981, Alan H. Guth at Massachusetts Institute of Technology built on
>>this idea by suggesting that the universe might have gone through an
>unstable,
>>super-cooled state during which the universe would undergo exponential
>>expansion. Super-cooling is common during phase transitions. For example,
>>undisturbed water can be cooled below 32 degrees Fahrenheit. But the
>>slightest disturbance causes it to freeze rapidly.
>>
>>Despite its popularity the original inflation theory had a fatal flaw, Linde
>>said. It portrayed the period of inflation as taking place in what physicists
>>call a false vacuum. This is a state without any particles, but with a lot
>>of potential energy. "The problem with this idea is that this completely
>>symmetric and nice state is so empty that you do not have any preferable
>>coordinate system," he said. That means there is no way to determine whether
>>the universe is expanding or not and, if you cannot make that determination,
>>then the expansion is not real; instead it is a "false expansion."
>>
>>After exploring his idea for a year, Guth concluded that it could not
>>work. But Linde found a way to rescue it in 1982 with what he dubbed "new
>>inflationary theory." He did so by showing that inflation can take place in
>>a false vacuum state that has begun to deteriorate. A few months later the
>>same idea was proposed by Andreas Albrecht and Paul Steinhardt at the
>>University of Pennsylvania. "If you have just a little bit of change, then
>>you can have this preferable system that tells you when it is expanding,"
>>he said.
>>
>>They proposed that the energy in this near-false-vacuum state would be
>>contained in a scalar field, often called the inflaton field. There is no
>>exact comparison to such a field in nature today. But an electrostatic field,
>>like that generated by the static build-up in clothes that causes them to
>>cling, is a close analogy. A uniform electrostatic field is virtually
>>undetectable: It only generates electrical and magnetic fields when it is
>>inhomogeneous or changes over time. The inflaton field has the same basic
>>characteristics but differs in one important way: It carries its own energy.
>>
>>The theorists argued that, when the inflaton field began falling, the
>>primordial universe could undergo real, exponential inflation rather than
>>false inflation. An imaginary observer equipped with a gravity meter would
>>begin recording a slight weakening in the force of gravity and, if she were
>>able to mark two different positions in nearby space, she would see them
>>begin flying apart.
>>
>>As the scalar field decreases, it undergoes a phenomenon called quantum
>>fluctuations. They are predicted by quantum electrodynamics, the laws that
>>explain the behavior of subatomic particles. Initially, these oscillations
>>would be sub-microscopic in scale. But as space inflates they become larger
>>and larger, until they become the size of galaxies. Because these
>fluctuations
>>correspond to variations in energy density, when the period of inflation
>ends,
>>larger amounts of matter would be produced in areas where the field is high
>>than in regions where it is low. Thus, they can explain the formation of
>>galaxies, Linde said.
>>
>>The mechanism is also consistent with the discovery of slight variations in
>>the strength of the cosmic background radiation discovered in 1992. They are
>>also interpreted as the product of quantum fluctuations in the glowing soup
>>of matter and energy. They are much smaller because they occurred before the
>>universe finished its period of exponential expansion.
>>
>>Chaotic inflation eliminates a number of old assumptions
>>
>>Like old inflation, new inflation retained the assumption that the universe
>>began both hot and in thermal equilibrium, that is, at the same temperature
>>everywhere. Then inflation took place and all the original particles were
>>swept away in the extraordinary growth spurt. At the end of the inflationary
>>period, particles were recreated and then reheated by the fluctuating scalar
>>field.
>>
>>But, if an inflationary period occurred, Linde realized that it also swept
>>away virtually all information about the conditions that preceded it. The
>>evidence scientists had interpreted as indicating hot conditions at the birth
>>of the universe, like the cosmic background radiation, must refer to the
>>post-inflation period instead of the period before it.
>>
>>"What evidence is there that the universe was originally hot? What evidence
>>is there that it was in thermal equilibrium? None at all," Linde objected.
>>
>>So the cosmologist went back to the drawing board and came up with a third
>>version of inflationary theory called chaotic inflation. In this approach,
>>the big bang remains but becomes an aftereffect of cosmic inflation. He found
>>that he could jettison a number of the other arbitrary assumptions on which
>>past cosmological theories have been based. In fact, he found that all he
>>needs to create a universe like our own is a patch of primordial universe
>>with a large scalar field that is moving toward its minimum value. "If the
>>scalar field falls down very slowly, it is nearly indistinguishable from a
>>false vacuum and the universe will inflate," he said.
>>
>>The cosmologist recounted the response he got from fellow scientists when he
>>first suggested that the universe might not have been initially hot. "They
>>said, 'No, we know it must be hot!'" Similarly, when he suggested it didn't
>>need to be in a condition of thermal equilibrium, colleagues responded,
>>"That is unnatural. It is not as beautiful as the assumption of initial
>>equilibrium!"
>>
>>For Linde, however, what is beautiful about chaotic inflation is its ability
>>to explain how the universe may have begun using a minimum number of
>>arbitrary assumptions: "You can start with any ugly part of the universe in a
>>non-equilibrium state." Some regions do not inflate. But that just means they
>>become insignificant. The parts that can undergo inflation, on the other
>hand,
>>become huge and most of the volume of the universe comes from them.
>>
>>Chaotic inflation "creates order out of chaos, not by destroying previous
>>chaos, but by exploding those parts that are capable of becoming
>non-chaotic,"
>>he said.
>>
>>An eternally self-reproducing universe
>>
>>Linde calls his latest variation on the inflation theme the eternally self-
>>reproducing universe. He began by asking himself if the inflaton field
>>would always go down. He concluded that, in very rare instances, quantum
>>fluctuations would cause the field to jump up in some parts of the universe.
>>These places would be extremely rare. When the inflaton field increases,
>>however, some of these sites would begin inflating madly. In almost no time,
>>they grow into very large regions with high scalar fields. Then, within these
>>inflated regions, the process repeats itself. Quantum fluctuations strike
>>again, causing the field strength to jump in a few localities, some of which
>>undergo a second round of inflation. And so on, ad infinitum.
>>
>>"So you have those parts of the universe where the field is going down,"
>>Linde said. "That is the part of the universe where we live. The energy
>>density is already down. But there are some areas of the universe where the
>>scalar field jumps up, against the normal laws of physics. In this way the
>>universe reproduces itself."
>>
>>While these expanding regions of the universe are inaccessible to us, they
>>are still important, he said. "From the point of view of the general geometry
>>of space, our part of the universe has been created, but other parts of the
>>universe are still being created. If life in our part of the universe were
>>to disappear, then it will appear again someplace else. So the universe as a
>>whole becomes immortal."
>>
>>                     -30-
>>
>>[Image: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/release/990127inflate.html]
>>
>>This is a graphical representation of a self-reproducing universe. The
>>spikes represent regions that are undergoing inflation. The different colors
>>represent areas where the basic physical laws differ. For example, in one
>>area electrons may be heavy and in another they may be light. Credit: Andrei
>>Linde
>>
>>
>>
>



Reply via email to