Hi Y'all,
Jim Clark wrote:
> Even so, I think it
> would be better to point out shortcomings in the ideas without
> calling people bigots or ignorant. There are enough lists out
> there in which that is the norm for discussion. I also believe
> that if one is going to advocate for tolerance of different
> ideas, then one good approach is to demonstrate similar
> forbearance with people whose ideas you disagree with.
On most things I would agree. However, if an individual is consistently
posting to a discussion list making statements that are sexist, racist,
homophobic, anti-Semitic, etc., it is the responsibility of others to object.
Blanket tolerance of all behaviors only serves as tacit approval for behaviors
that are not acceptable.
The regular posting of anti-Semitic ideas, in this case, on a professional
discussion list is unacceptable. Similarly, the presentation of such
information as just an exchange of ideas in the classroom would be problematic
and most likely violate university policies.
Should we also tolerate racist jokes on the list? Occasional sexual harassment
on the list?
I, for one, have a real problem with standing by in silence in the face of such
behavior.
Warm regards,
linda
>
>
> Best wishes
> Jim
>
> ============================================================================
> James M. Clark (204) 786-9313
> Department of Psychology (204) 774-4134 Fax
> University of Winnipeg 4L02A
> Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CANADA http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
> ============================================================================
--
linda m. woolf, ph.d.
associate professor - psychology
webster university
main webpage: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/
Holocaust and genocide studies pages:
http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/holocaust.html
womens' pages: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/women.html
gerontology pages: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/gero.html
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
