----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Pitchford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 2:57 PM
Subject: [evol-psych] Are the signs of dyslexia in a newborn baby?


> FOR RELEASE: 18 AUGUST 1999 AT 14:00:00 ET US
> New Scientist
> http://www.newscientist.com/
>
> Are the signs of dyslexia in a newborn baby?
>
> It may be possible to identify newborn babies who will grow up to be
dyslexic.
> Psychologists in Illinois have correctly predicted dyslexia in 8-year-olds
on
> the basis of their brain waves just hours after birth. Earlier detection
may
> make it possible to reduce or even eliminate reading problems in
childhood.
>
> Dyslexia, a learning disability characterised by problems reading and
writing,
> is thought to afflict around 5 per cent of the world's population.
Children are
> often diagnosed with the condition only after they have experienced
serious
> difficulties in school. "By this time, children's minds are not so
flexible and
> they find it harder to master new skills," says Dennis Molfese, a
psychologist
> at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale.
>
> Molfese and his colleagues attached electrodes to the scalps of 186 babies
> around 36 hours old. While playing recorded speech and non-speech sounds,
they
> monitored the size and speed of the newborns' brainwave responses. Then
they
> gave the children IQ and comprehension tests every two years until the age
of
> 8, when normal, poor and dyslexic readers were identified.
>
> Comparing the newborn brain wave patterns of the three groups, the
researchers
> spotted several telltale differences between the dyslexics and the better
> readers. Such differences may arise from selective damage to nerves in the
> fetal brain, which is thought to cause dyslexia (New Scientist, 24 April
1999,
> p 26). As Molfese will tell a symposium on dyslexia in October at the Max
> Planck Institute in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 22 out of the 24 dyslexics
could
> have been identified at birth on the basis of these differences, and could
have
> received early educational intervention.
>
> However, several babies who grew up to be normal readers would also have
been
> targeted for intervention. For comparison, Molfese chose 24 children from
the
> normal reading group who matched the dyslexics in IQ and other skills. At
> birth, five of these had brain wave patterns similar to those of the
dyslexic
> children.
>
> Rod Nicolson, an expert on dyslexic children at the University of
Sheffield, is
> concerned that such mistakes would cause unnecessary worry for children
and
> parents. Nevertheless, he believes Molfese is on the right track. He says
a
> study in which the children are grouped at birth on the basis of their
brain
> waves, rather than later after reading problems develop, would be a better
> measure of the technique's usefulness. "What is needed now is a
prospective
> study of the same brain patterns in other samples, to see if they are
> reliable," he says. Such a study is already under way, says Molfese.
>
> Even if the brain wave technique proves reliable, the question of how
potential
> dyslexics should be treated remains controversial. Molfese says infants
who
> test positive could wear a special hearing aid that accentuates the
differences
> between speech sounds. Some research has suggested that dyslexia arises in
part
> from hearing problems early on.
>
> But Nicolson disagrees. He says interfering with normal hearing could slow
down
> the rate at which children acquire language. In his view, a less risky
solution
> would be to check for hearing difficulties and to increase infants'
exposure to
> speech.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ebates.com. Earn up to 25% cash back for shopping online at 75 stores
> like Borders, CDNow and Beyond.com. Refer a friend and earn even more!
> http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/690
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe/select DIGEST go to:
> http://www.egroups.com/group/evolutionary-psychology/info.html
> Human Nature
> http://www.human-nature.com
>
>
>


Reply via email to