Deb, addressing your message, let me the devil's advocate and get into
dangerous waters. Is a zygote a human being? Doesn't the answer depend
on a definition of human being? Do you think the answers are outside the
realm of science and evidentiary method? Or, as Voltaire and Jefferson
would argue, is science a resource for a teleological view that enters
non-scientific areas which may or may not contend with the traditional, in
this country, scriptural resource. Thoughts?
Make it a good day.
--Louis--
Louis Schmier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of History http://www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698 /~\ /\ /\
912-333-5947 /^\ / \ / /~\ \ /~\__/\
/ \__/ \/ / /\ /~\/ \
/\/\-/ /^\_____\____________/__/_______/^\
-_~ / "If you want to climb mountains, \ /^\
_ _ / don't practice on mole hills" - \____
- RE: Belief in the Unseen Paul C. Smith
- Data/anecdote quote Rick Froman
- Belief in the Unseen/Abortion study Stephen Black
- Re: Belief in the Unseen Jeff Ricker
- Re: Belief in the Unseen Louis_Schmier
- Re: Belief in the Unseen Mike Scoles
- Re: Belief in the Unseen Deb Briihl
- RE: Belief in the Unseen Dr. Kristina Lewis
- RE: Belief in the unseen Jeff Ricker
- RE: Belief in the unseen Deb Briihl
- Re: RE: Belief in the unseen Louis_Schmier
- Re: RE: Belief in the unseen Michael J. Kane
- Re: RE: Belief in the unseen Louis_Schmier
- Re: RE: Belief in the unseen Michael J. Kane
