At 8:30 AM -0400 10/20/99, Michael Sylvester wrote:
>> After a few replications (both direct and systematic), we might have some
>> confidence in either the tea or the witch doctor. You'd need the multiple
>> baseline design to separate the witch doctor from the tea.
>>
>> The definitive reference on single case experimental designs is:
>> Strategies and tactics of behavioral research
>> J.M. Johnston, H.S. Pennypacker.
>> 2nd ed.
>> Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
>>
>
> or referred to as the One-shot case.
By anyone other than you??
>Just curious as to how you would
>control for interaction and expectancy effects-which may not be cofined
>and restricted and assessed by only measuring the DV?
>the absence of the IV can also be viewed as a level of the IV.
That's what a multiple baseline design is for.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University, Mankato *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
