I have read 2 of the books and will soon read the third.  I was interested 
in them primarily because they were amazingly popular.  I have no scientific 
evidence to present, however I will present my reaction to the books and the 
flaps about the books.

Even as a middle-aged man, I enjoyed reading the books, good light reading.  
There are plenty of examples of critical thinking used by the main 
characters in the books and the use of magic does not undermine the critical 
thinking.  It is clearly a fantasy and I doubt that many children will 
become believers in the occult just based on these books.  Besides, the 
books suggest that being a wizard or witch is a genetic thing, and no 
training can give you the powers.  So, unless a child really has some 
problems, I would be surprised if the child would start becomming a believer 
of such things, based on these stories.  They are, primarily, good, 
interesting, exciting yarns.

If we are to eliminate the supernatural, we should eliminate fairy tales, 
much science fiction/fantasy, etc.  I bet many of us read science fiction as 
youngsters that included things like mind reading and other types of 
"magic."  Yet here we are able to thing critically about the world as we 
know it.

I also wonder why we are so afraid of children's minds.  They are not the 
putty in our hands, or the authors' hands we seem to imply with our 
concerns.  Children can be exposed to a large amount of information and 
texts and develop fine.  I am more worried about children that are kept from 
books, than about those exposed to the "wrong ones."

I also do not believe that our media is any more supportive of the 
paranormal than it used to be.  I think it always was supportive, at least 
in terms of the early sci fi magazines and shows like Science Fiction 
Theater (I am dating myself here) and later ones like Twilight Zone and even 
Star Trek.  In addition, there were many "psychics" on variety shows and 
talk shows who were not debunked.

The cultures support for the "occult" is not new and is, perhaps, not good, 
but I do not see that as an agument against the book Harry Potter.  Finally, 
if the reports of its effect on the reading behavior of youngsters is 
accurate, then the book is a positive boon to society.

Jeff Nagelbush
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to