There is not enough evidence here to draw a conclusion. Assuming that there was
pretty good evidence of cheating in the four cases, we could get a hit rates for
Russians and non-Russians if we knew the numbers of these types of students in
class. Were there any false alarms? That is, were there were suspicions of
cheating that, on closer inspection, were unfounded? Comparisons of these figures
might give information on differential response bias.
Donald Carter Davis wrote:
> Number of cheating incidents: 4
> Number of cheating incidents involving Russians 4
> Number of cheating incidents involving non-Russians 0
> % classes having cheating incidents in classes
> where 2 or more Russians were enrolled 100%
> % classes having cheating incidents in classes
> where 0 Russians were enrolled 0%
>
--
*****************************************************************
* Mike Scoles * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Department of Psychology * voice: (501) 450-5418 *
* University of Central Arkansas * fax: (501) 450-5424 *
* Conway, AR 72035-0001 * *
********* http://www.coe.uca.edu/psych/scoles/index.html ********
