On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:15:30 -0400 "Michael J. Kane" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I have a 2-part question, based on the following (too true) premise:
> 
> I just gave the first exam of a Cognitive Psychology course, which consisted of
> multiple-choice and short-answer questions.  The class includes many 1st and
> 2nd year students, with a smattering of 3rd and 4th year students.  Based on
> percent-correct scores, my grade distribution breaks down as follows:
> A's: 11%
> B's: 11%
> C's: 11%
> D's: 18%
> F's: 50%
> 
> Yikes.  Clearly, some students performed admirably, but many others did 
> not.  So here


Mike:

Generally I am opposed to curving grades, especially in this 
case.  It suggests to the F-students that you will back down and 
assign them acceptable grades whatever their performance.  It 
suggests to the A-students that their hard work and attention in 
class was for naught and, instead, they should strive to be just 
a little better than the pack. It suggests to all students that 
you are uncertain about your standards, or are willing to 
compromise under difficult circumstances.  (In local parlance, a 
"pud.")

As to fairness, that is a different issue.  If you are sure this 
was a "fair" evaluation then I would go into class and be honest 
and direct with the students.

Generally, I take a criterion approach to these situations.  I 
tell them there is a certain level of knowledge I expect them to 
have acquired.  They didn't achieve it on this test, but they 
did see what was expected of them.  Depending on the context and 
the course, I give them a second opportunity to demonstrate 
their success.  This may be to rewrite a paper or to take 
another exam on the topic.  However, if they are satisfied with 
their grade then they do not have to do anything.  (And many are 
satisfied with a C or a D in a course since they are just 
cruising through college.)

I have found that almost all students understand this approach 
and consider it "fair."


Good luck.

Ken (getting ready to return some methods papers that received 
poor grades)


> Thanks much!
> 
> -Mike
> ************************************************
> Michael J. Kane
> Department of Psychology
> P.O. Box 26164
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
> Greensboro, NC 27402-6164
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> phone: 336-256-1022
> fax: 336-334-5066
> 

----------------------
Kenneth M. Steele                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Psychology
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA 



Reply via email to