> So, you'll find that, based on research, extrinsics are much more likely than
> intrinsics to approach religion from a fear-based perspective. And this is
> usually a very shallow, superficial religiosity, that tends to destruct quite
> easily.
>
If that were the case, how would psychologists be able to make the
distinction any more? The extrinsic orientation underlies much of the
social cohesion, shared ritual, and authoritative hierarchies in most
communities. By its very nature, it should be the majority approach as
it provides a more fundamental sense of security and (social) purpose.
Gee, it's fun to speculate without data. What's this got to do with
teaching of psych? Gary Peterson
- Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schizophrenia? Hatcher, Joe
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schizophr... Jim Guinee
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schiz... Mike Scoles
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schiz... Roderick D. Hetzel
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent s... G. Marc Turner
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schizophr... Jim Guinee
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schiz... Gerald Peterson
- Re: Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent s... Jim Guinee
- Re:Vivid teaching moment: Benevolent schizophre... Jim Guinee
- God, Tomlin, Szasz, and schizophrenia Stephen Black
- Looking for summer teaching gig Robin Pearce
- Re: God, Tomlin, Szasz, and schizophrenia Esther Yoder Strahan
- God, Tomlin, Szasz, schizophrenia, and S... Stephen Black
- measures of critical thinking Deborah Briihl
