Paul wrote:
> TIPS seems to be working extremely well as it is currently
> configured. I'd resist the pressures from the IT people to
> implement some sort of package whose primary purpose is
> running a Web-based bulletin board type discussion group,
> with traditional listserv functions as an afterthought. I've
> had all sorts of access problems with lists that have done
> this (and heard the complaints from others on these lists).
I have to disagree with you to a point on that, Paul. I manage
over 40 lists and have tried both email-only and web-only systems (both
of which are available in packages that don't have the kinds of problems
you describe above--they were _designed_ as listservers) and ended up
selecting a system that offers _both_ interfaces. The ability to post to
a list on the web, versus only by email, means that a list member can
post (and read messages) from public terminals and other computers that
they can't receive email on (unless they use a web based email address,
of course, which no one here on TIPS does as far as I know). That's a
pretty nice advantage, particularly when you consider that well designed
list managers with web interfaces (I use Lyris personally, but several
exist) are just as efficient (and full featured) as the traditional
"Listserv" when it comes to the email list functions.
I _do_ agree that a web only interface is a pain--and stifles
open discussion. But if Bill is able to implement a web/email interface,
it would certainly add new resources to TIPS that would benefit
everyone.
Rick
--
Rick Adams
Department of Social Sciences
Jackson Community College
Jackson, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"... and the only measure of your worth and your deeds will be the love
you leave behind when you're gone. --Fred Small, Everything Possible "
