Hi All-

A good overview of the work in this area can be found here:

Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity 
of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?
Christopher Hertzog 1 , Arthur F. Kramer 2 , Robert S. Wilson 3 , and Ulman 
Lindenberger 4 
  1 Georgia Institute of Technology,   2 University of Illinois – 
Urbana-Champaign,   3 Rush University Medical Center, and   4 Max Planck 
Institute for Human Development, Berlin 
 Address correspondence to Christopher Hertzog, School of Psychology, Georgia 
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0170; e-mail: 
[email protected]. 
Copyright © 2009 Association for Psychological Science
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY—In this monograph, we ask whether various kinds of intellectual, 
physical, and social activities produce cognitive enrichment effects—that is, 
whether they improve cognitive performance at different points of the adult 
life span, with a particular emphasis on old age.
We begin with a theoretical framework that emphasizes the potential of behavior 
to influence levels of cognitive functioning. According to this framework, the 
undeniable presence of age-related decline in cognition does not invalidate the 
view that behavior can enhance cognitive functioning. Instead, the course of 
normal aging shapes a zone of possible functioning, which reflects 
person-specific endowments and age-related constraints. Individuals influence 
whether they function in the higher or lower ranges of this zone by engaging in 
or refraining from beneficial intellectual, physical, and social activities. 
From this point of view, the potential for positive change, or plasticity, is 
maintained in adult cognition. It is an argument that is supported by newer 
research in neuroscience showing neural plasticity in various aspects of 
central nervous system functioning, neurochemistry, and architecture. This view 
of human potential contrasts with static conceptions of cognition in old age, 
according to which decline in abilities is fixed and individuals cannot slow 
its course. Furthermore, any understanding of cognition as it occurs in 
everyday life must make a distinction between basic cognitive mechanisms and 
skills (such as working-memory capacity) and the functional use of cognition to 
achieve goals in specific situations. In practice, knowledge and expertise are 
critical for effective functioning, and the available evidence suggests that 
older adults effectively employ specific knowledge and expertise and can gain 
new knowledge when it is required.
We conclude that, on balance, the available evidence favors the hypothesis that 
maintaining an intellectually engaged and physically active lifestyle promotes 
successful cognitive aging. First, cognitive-training studies have demonstrated 
that older adults can improve cognitive functioning when provided with 
intensive training in strategies that promote thinking and remembering. The 
early training literature suggested little transfer of function from 
specifically trained skills to new cognitive tasks; learning was highly 
specific to the cognitive processes targeted by training. Recently, however, a 
new generation of studies suggests that providing structured experience in 
situations demanding executive coordination of skills—such as complex video 
games, task-switching paradigms, and divided attention tasks—train strategic 
control over cognition that does show transfer to different task environments. 
These studies suggest that there is considerable reserve potential in older 
adults' cognition that can be enhanced through training.
Second, a considerable number of studies indicate that maintaining a lifestyle 
that is intellectually stimulating predicts better maintenance of cognitive 
skills and is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer's disease 
in late life. Our review focuses on longitudinal evidence of a connection 
between an active lifestyle and enhanced cognition, because such evidence 
admits fewer rival explanations of observed effects (or lack of effects) than 
does cross-sectional evidence. The longitudinal evidence consistently shows 
that engaging in intellectually stimulating activities is associated with 
better cognitive functioning at later points in time. Other studies show that 
meaningful social engagement is also predictive of better maintenance of 
cognitive functioning in old age. These longitudinal findings are also open to 
important rival explanations, but overall, the available evidence suggests that 
activities can postpone decline, attenuate decline, or provide prosthetic 
benefit in the face of normative cognitive decline, while at the same time 
indicating that late-life cognitive changes can result in curtailment of 
activities. Given the complexity of the dynamic reciprocal relationships 
between stimulating activities and cognitive function in old age, additional 
research will be needed to address the extent to which observed effects 
validate a causal influence of an intellectually engaged lifestyle on 
cognition. Nevertheless, the hypothesis that an active lifestyle that requires 
cognitive effort has long-term benefits for older adults' cognition is at least 
consistent with the available data. Furthermore, new intervention research that 
involves multimodal interventions focusing on goal-directed action requiring 
cognition (such as reading to children) and social interaction will help to 
address whether an active lifestyle enhances cognitive function.
Third, there is a parallel literature suggesting that physical activity, and 
aerobic exercise in particular, enhances older adults' cognitive function. 
Unlike the literature on an active lifestyle, there is already an impressive 
array of work with humans and animal populations showing that exercise 
interventions have substantial benefits for cognitive function, particularly 
for aspects of fluid intelligence and executive function. Recent neuroscience 
research on this topic indicates that exercise has substantial effects on brain 
morphology and function, representing a plausible brain substrate for the 
observed effects of aerobic exercise and other activities on cognition.
Our review identifies a number of areas where additional research is needed to 
address critical questions. For example, there is considerable epidemiological 
evidence that stress and chronic psychological distress are negatively 
associated with changes in cognition. In contrast, less is known about how 
positive attributes, such as self-efficacy, a sense of control, and a sense of 
meaning in life, might contribute to preservation of cognitive function in old 
age. It is well known that certain personality characteristics such as 
conscientiousness predict adherence to an exercise regimen, but we do not know 
whether these attributes are also relevant to predicting maintenance of 
cognitive function or effective compensation for cognitive decline when it 
occurs. Likewise, more information is needed on the factors that encourage 
maintenance of an active lifestyle in old age in the face of elevated risk for 
physiological decline, mechanical wear and tear on the body, and incidence of 
diseases with disabling consequences, and whether efforts to maintain an active 
lifestyle are associated with successful aging, both in terms of cognitive 
function and psychological and emotional well-being.
We also discuss briefly some interesting issues for society and public policy 
regarding cognitive-enrichment effects. For example, should efforts to enhance 
cognitive function be included as part of a general prevention model for 
enhancing health and vitality in old age? We also comment on the recent trend 
of business marketing interventions claimed to build brain power and prevent 
age-related cognitive decline, and the desirability of direct research evidence 
to back claims of effectiveness for specific products.



DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x About DOI

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:45 am
Subject: Re: [tips] Is this a myth?
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>

> On 23 Mar 2010 at 7:22, Lilienfeld, Scott O wrote:
> 
> >  I'm definitely no expert on this one, but my distinct 
> impression is that it's far too early to call 
> > "use it or lose it" a myth. The famous "nun study" and several 
> other longitudinal studies point to 
> > possible benefits of "cognitive exercise" and mental activity 
> as protective factors against 
> > dementing illness, although my understanding is that the 
> causal direction here is still somewhat 
> > controversial (people with better cognitive reserves to start 
> with may be more likely to engage in 
> > cognitive exercise). Attempts to control for potential 
> covariates still point to possible causal 
> > effects of cognitive exercise, but I'm not sure the issue is 
> resolved conclusively.
> 
> My impression is similar to that of Scott's, that there is some 
> evidence that mental activity (doing crossword puzzles, say), is 
> protective of cognitive function in the elderly. But I also 
> agree 
> that the main problem is in deciding whether it's more a case of 
> "those who can, do" rather than "use it or lose it". One of the 
> earliest signs of dementia may be an inability to carry out 
> cognitive exercises and a corresponding lack of interest in 
> them. 
> Rather than a cause of dementia, it may be an early result. 
> 
> My mother, for example, was an avid devotee of crossword 
> puzzles, and I used to clip them out from the newspaper and 
> enlarge them on a photocopier for her poor vision.  But I 
> knew 
> something was up when she started leaving them undone. 
> 
> The best evidence, I believe, for a  protective effect 
> against 
> cognitive decline is not mental activity, but physical.  
> For 
> example, a recent Cochrane review (Angevaren et al, 2008) of 
> randomized controlled trials cautiously concludes:
> 
> "There is evidence that aerobic physical activities which 
> improve 
> cardiorespiratory fitness are beneficial for cognitive function 
> in 
> healthy older adults, with effects observed for motor function, 
> cognitive speed, delayed memory functions and auditory and 
> visual attention. However, the majority of comparisons yielded 
> no significant results".
> 
> Me, I'm getting regular doses of skiing and tennis just in case. 
> Well no, actually, because they're fun. But it would be ok if 
> they 
> helped as well. Now, where did I leave my car keys?
> 
> Stephen
> 
> Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD005381.
> Physical activity and enhanced fitness to improve cognitive 
> function in older people without known cognitive impairment.
> 
> Angevaren M, Aufdemkampe G, Verhaar HJ, Aleman A, Vanhees L.
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> Stephen L. Black, 
> Ph.D.          
> Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
> Bishop's 
> University               
> e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
> 2600 College St.
> Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
> Canada
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98f18&n=T&l=tips&o=1479or
>  send a blank email to 
> leave-1479-13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=1481
or send a blank email to 
leave-1481-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to