NO!!! People are constantly falling for this psychocrap. We need to keep 
talking about the real truth over and over and over again in the media because 
we are being countered by the "evidence" (mostly testimonials) provided by the 
purveyors of this expensive snake oil.

Annette

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________
From: Christopher D. Green [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 5:45 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Putting brain training to the test




I saw news items related to this yesterday, and was surprised that it counted 
as "news" or that anyone could get it published as "research." Certainly it was 
widely known among cognitive psychologists that these kinds of packages, 
although perhaps mildly entertaining, were useless in terms of improving 
general cognitive function back in the early 1990s when I was a grad student. 
Didn't everyone (who isn't also taken in by homeopathy and chiropractic) know?

Chris
--

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada



416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================

Allen Esterson wrote:

?From the current issue of Nature:

Putting brain training to the test

‘Brain training’, or the goal of improved cognitive function through
the regular use of computerized tests, is a multimillionpound
industry[1], yet in our view scientific evidence to support its
efficacy is lacking. Modest effects have been reported in some studies
of older individuals[2,3] and preschool children[4], and video-game
players outperform non-players on some tests of visual attention[5].
However, the widely held belief that commercially available
computerized brain-training programs improve general cognitive function
in the wider population in our opinion lacks empirical support.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vnfv/ncurrent/pdf/nature09042.pdf

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.esterson.org


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13132.a868d710aa4ef67a68807ce4fe8bd0da&n=T&l=tips&o=2126
or send a blank email to 
leave-2126-13132.a868d710aa4ef67a68807ce4fe8bd...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-2126-13132.a868d710aa4ef67a68807ce4fe8bd...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>







---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21b0&n=T&l=tips&o=2129

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-2129-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-2129-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=2141
or send a blank email to 
leave-2141-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to