I think that if you added this to our department chair's plate he would just 
collapse, quite literally.

I assume that the duties of chairs at most universities are similar to ours, 
who is about to retire and NO ONE wants the job!

For a single course RT the workload is OVERWHELMING. We have 13 full time 
tenure/track faculty with two 5/8ths and about 12 adjuncts teaching one or two 
courses in any given semester.

ALL administrative paperwork, financial record keeping, etc.; all student 
administrative work, I mean EVERYTHING is expected to be done in that 1 course 
RT.

Are you kidding me? I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole!

When younger I had such aspirations. Since then I have wised up.

To add one more thing would just be ridiculous. It is hard enough to get the 
adjuncts and nontenured folks evaluated.

In a perfect world...........it would be a great idea. As it is, those of us 
who care, do what we can to improve.

Annette

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________
From: Claudia Stanny [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:04 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Curious about department heads




I'm not a department chair, but I've had this discussion with a number of 
department chairs around campus.

UWF is also a unionized campus.  The collective bargaining agreement does 
provide for chair observation of classroom teaching with appropriate advance 
notice.  This applies to online classes as well as face-to-face classes.  The 
mechanism for an online class visit would be to have the chair visit the class, 
which is accomplished through the guest instructor role (appropriate 
notification would come when the chair requested guest instructor status before 
the term began and the course opened).  UWF has been participating in the 
Quality Matters work for online courses, which entails having a trained 
reviewer visit the online course and evaluate the quality of pedagogy using the 
QM rubric.  If you haven't seen this rubric, it is worth a look.  With a few 
exceptions that deal specifically with the technology of delivery, the QM 
rubric would be equally useful for evaluating the pedagogy used in face-to-face 
classes.

I run a peer mentoring group for teaching in which faculty visit one another's 
classes to make observations and offer formative feedback.  Peer mentors are 
always from a slightly different discipline to keep the focus on teaching.  
Faculty participants in this program who teach online courses use the guest 
instructor role to visit one another's online courses.  They uniformly report 
that this is a mutually beneficial activity.  We meet twice a year for general 
discussion of teaching.  These meetings are always a delight, filled with great 
insights and comments about teaching strategies.  Some of these partnerships 
have persisted for nearly 3 years now, with mutual classroom observation and 
feedback occurring every year.

I think it is unfortunate that more chairs do not make appropriately-structured 
classroom observations (appropriately structured is a key qualifier here - 
there are better and worse ways of doing these).  These observations would 
provide much more useful and compelling evidence about the quality of teaching 
when chairs write annual evaluations and comment on the quality of a 
candidate's teaching in a tenure and promotion letter than simply relying on 
the numerical ratings from the typical course evaluation.

In an institution that has a culture in which chairs never enter another 
faculty member's classroom for observation unless there is serious concern 
about a problem, faculty would be understandably paranoid about a request for a 
visit.  But in a culture that values teaching and recognizes classroom 
observation and formative feedback as a mechanism for nurturing high-quality 
teaching, people are much more welcoming of classroom observations by peers and 
even chairs.

For those interested in the observation process, check out the Teaching 
Partners pages on the CUTLA web site (uwf.edu/cutla<http://uwf.edu/cutla>).



Claudia Stanny


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21b0&n=T&l=tips&o=7961

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-7961-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-7961-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7962
or send a blank email to 
leave-7962-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to