Hi
 
I think many of the comments have it more correct than the article ...
that is, they point out that humans have for a long-time depended on
memory crutches (writing, wife to remember birthdays or where stuff is
in the house, ...).  I just do not understand why researchers want or
need to dramatize their results.  Consider the following from the
article.
 

"A second experiment was aimed at determining whether computer
accessibility affects precisely what we remember. *If asked the question
whether there are any countries with only one color in their flag, for
example,* the researchers wrote, *do we think about flags * or
immediately think to go online to find out?*
In this case, participants were asked to remember both the trivia
statement itself and which of five computer folders it was saved in. The
researchers were surprised to find that people seemed better able to
recall the folder.
*That kind of blew my mind,* Dr. Sparrow said in an interview."
I don't have access to the full article, so don't know how large the
difference referred to as "better" was, but 
should it really be characterized as "surprising" and "blowing my mind"
no matter how large?
 
 
Perhaps a better title here would have been "Are sensationalistic
reports about the brain, the internet, whatever making people stupid." 

 
Take care
Jim
 
 
 
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected] 

>>> "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> 15-Jul-11 3:43 PM >>>
Consider:

If you have immediate access to information (or the belief that you
have immediate access to information), would you bother to engage
in memory encoding of new information that would produce a
durable memory trace/representation of that information?

The answer appears to be "No".

The New York Times and other outlets are reporting on a new
study by Sparrow, Liu and Wegner that was just printed in Science.
The NY Times article can be accessed here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/health/15memory.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha26


Here is a blog on the PC World website that covers the story:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/235757/google_is_changing_the_way_you_think_say_researchers.html


One can access the Science magazine article here:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2011/07/13/science.1207745#aff-2


Betsy Sparrow of Columbia U. and Daniel Wegner have been
doing research along these lines, using Wegner's construct of
"Transactive Memory", that is, memories can be thought of as
being distributed member of a group or a community and if
specific members retain certain types of information (e.g., the
history of the group), then others don't have to learn that
information
because of their access to those persons (however, if no one
learns what those people know, then that knowledge will be lost,
that is, lack of redundancy can result in loss of knowledge as well
as confounding biases of the rememberer with the information).

Of course, the problems associated with such "offline memory"
are nothing new.  I believe one argument against the use of books
was that relying upon books was a sign of a lazy mind, that one
was following a principle of least effort instead of "active learning"
of material and forming durable knowledge structures.

The only question I have about this alleged reliance on offline info
is:

What are you going to do when the Zombie Apocalypse (tm) comes,
the internet and electricity gets shut down, and you'll be busy
running
from the undead who think that you'd make an excellent snack?

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected] 












---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=11455

or send a blank email to
leave-11455-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=11456
or send a blank email to 
leave-11456-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to