Hi

Another fundamental consequence of behaviorism for psychology was (is), I 
believe the emphasis psychology places on observable events (i.e., behavior, 
including verbal reports) in conceptualizing and testing models of 
psychological events.  This has helped psychology to avoid some of the pitfalls 
of over-theorizing that have afflicted other social sciences, and perhaps is 
one reason why psychology is often separated from the social sciences when 
there are attacks on the credibility and scientific nature of those disciplines.

Take care
Jim


James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected]

>>> "Joan Warmbold" <[email protected]> 24-May-12 3:52 am >>>
Michael,

My initial response is what took you so long to see the true way, lol?  I
don't think age is a factor as I have been a faithful and true believer of
the science of behaviorism as studied by Skinner, Pavlov and Bandura since
my years as an undergraduate.  To the contrary, I always have been
perplexed and saddened by the strong appeal of the plethora of
unscientific theories of personality that are based only on authoritative
evidence.

Not that I don't understand the intrigue of the theories of Freud and Jung
as they both incorporate many intellectually complex and fascinating ideas
about the human psyche.  And as I have told my students from day one, if
we had a popularity contest among the various theories, Carl Rogers
humanistic theory would win hands down. I mean, gee whiz, how can we not
want to embrace a theory that supports so many desirable and ego-boosting
perspectives about our nature, including the notion that we have free-will
and an inborn drive to self-actualize.  The fact that Rogers' views never
had empirical support was of little concern.  They reinforced our (naive)
view of ourselves and that was that. Meanwhile, that steely-eyed Skinner
guy kept insisting that we don't have free-will and that our experiences
played a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and choices.  Poor B.F. was
done in by one of the basic elements of his research on operant
conditioning.  His scientifically supported conclusions were simply too
punishing for many to hear.


But within recent years it cannot be ignored that just about every where
we turn, the learning principles discovered by the big three, Pavlov,
Skinner and Bandura, are enabling therapists to use behavioral strategies
that provide dramatic and amazing assistance to many we thought were
beyond our reach--like autistic children; veterans with PSTD; expanding
the movement capabilities of people who have had a stroke, MS or cerebral
palsy (see Edward Taub's use of shaping); people dealing with advanced OCD
or many years of dealing with panic attacks.

So, though many still might prefer the ideas and theories of Freud, Jung,
Rogers, they have not truly advanced our ability to improve the lives of
those dealing with serious dysfunctions.  We would have to be both blind
and dumb to not accept that it was the research of Skinner on operant
conditioning as well as Pavlov's work on classical conditioning and 
Bandura's work on observational learning that have enabled therapists to
help patients make dramatic improvements in the lives of so very many.


Joan


> My graduate advisor once said to me - and he was in his 70s at the time -
> that "when you're young you're a democrat and when you're older you're a
> republican".  I think the expression is also known as, "A democrat is just
> a republican who hasn't been mugged yet."
>
> Well, this change in political party hasn't happened to me yet, but I was
> wondering if I'm becoming more behavioristic as I grow older.  I remember
> when I was an impressionistic lad I was all over Maslow/Rogers theory.
> Now I've grown somewhat pessimistic about the efficacy of all that talk
> therapy and I wonder if changing our circumstances is, in the end, more
> important in our lives than all that talk.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Michael
>
>
> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
> [email protected] 
> http://www.ThePsychFiles.com 
>
>
>
>
>
>



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=17994
 
or send a blank email to 
leave-17994-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18004
or send a blank email to 
leave-18004-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to