My own saga:
When I dropped out of engineering after my freshman year I gravitated into 
psychology.
Behaviorism seemed consistent with a scientific predisposition, and Brown was 
behavioral (although not Skinnerian) in the early sixties.
I didn't find out that I was a Skinnerian until I was in grad school ;-).

I've always had reservations about whether behaviorism offered a complete 
account of human action
(as did Skinner, BTW, who viewed psychology as a subfield of biology and 
thought that physiology would ultimately complement psychology in providing a 
complete account of behavior), 
but I've yet to come across a better alternative (but I'm still looking).

On May 23, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Joan Warmbold wrote:

> Michael,
> 
> My initial response is what took you so long to see the true way, lol?  I
> don't think age is a factor as I have been a faithful and true believer of
> the science of behaviorism as studied by Skinner, Pavlov and Bandura since
> my years as an undergraduate.  To the contrary, I always have been
> perplexed and saddened by the strong appeal of the plethora of
> unscientific theories of personality that are based only on authoritative
> evidence.
> 
> Not that I don't understand the intrigue of the theories of Freud and Jung
> as they both incorporate many intellectually complex and fascinating ideas
> about the human psyche.  And as I have told my students from day one, if
> we had a popularity contest among the various theories, Carl Rogers
> humanistic theory would win hands down. I mean, gee whiz, how can we not
> want to embrace a theory that supports so many desirable and ego-boosting
> perspectives about our nature, including the notion that we have free-will
> and an inborn drive to self-actualize.  The fact that Rogers' views never
> had empirical support was of little concern.  They reinforced our (naive)
> view of ourselves and that was that. Meanwhile, that steely-eyed Skinner
> guy kept insisting that we don't have free-will and that our experiences
> played a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and choices.  Poor B.F. was
> done in by one of the basic elements of his research on operant
> conditioning.  His scientifically supported conclusions were simply too
> punishing for many to hear.
> 
> 
> But within recent years it cannot be ignored that just about every where
> we turn, the learning principles discovered by the big three, Pavlov,
> Skinner and Bandura, are enabling therapists to use behavioral strategies
> that provide dramatic and amazing assistance to many we thought were
> beyond our reach--like autistic children; veterans with PSTD; expanding
> the movement capabilities of people who have had a stroke, MS or cerebral
> palsy (see Edward Taub's use of shaping); people dealing with advanced OCD
> or many years of dealing with panic attacks.
> 
> So, though many still might prefer the ideas and theories of Freud, Jung,
> Rogers, they have not truly advanced our ability to improve the lives of
> those dealing with serious dysfunctions.  We would have to be both blind
> and dumb to not accept that it was the research of Skinner on operant
> conditioning as well as Pavlov's work on classical conditioning and 
> Bandura's work on observational learning that have enabled therapists to
> help patients make dramatic improvements in the lives of so very many.
> 
> 
> Joan
> 
> 
>> My graduate advisor once said to me - and he was in his 70s at the time -
>> that "when you're young you're a democrat and when you're older you're a
>> republican".  I think the expression is also known as, "A democrat is just
>> a republican who hasn't been mugged yet."
>> 
>> Well, this change in political party hasn't happened to me yet, but I was
>> wondering if I'm becoming more behavioristic as I grow older.  I remember
>> when I was an impressionistic lad I was all over Maslow/Rogers theory.
>> Now I've grown somewhat pessimistic about the efficacy of all that talk
>> therapy and I wonder if changing our circumstances is, in the end, more
>> important in our lives than all that talk.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.ThePsychFiles.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13438.3b5166ef147b143fedd04b1c4a64900b&n=T&l=tips&o=17994
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-17994-13438.3b5166ef147b143fedd04b1c4a649...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Paul Brandon
10 Crown Hill Lane
Mankato, MN 56001
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18011
or send a blank email to 
leave-18011-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to