There is lots of interesting research on the effects of graphic pictures on 
cigarette packs. The primary audience is often not the smokers (who are already 
using the product) but rather children (who can put significant pressure on 
adults who smoke) or young adults who are not yet smoking. It is difficulty to 
test the effects of graphic pictures in a real life setting and experimental 
research does not well capture what actually happens when the pictures are put 
on packs in a country. Some research shows correlational evidence of an effect 
of graphic pictures whereas other research shows no effect. Also, it appears 
that the images are approved to be put on packages in countries once smoking is 
already moralized and smoking rates are therefore already declining. So some 
interesting methodological questions about how to measure effectively.

Yes there are significant cultural differences in smoking risk perceptions. You 
can see my research both comparing US and Danes and how risk beliefs are 
related to moralized views of smoking. I've also done some research examining 
risk beliefs among Bosnian refugees. Here beliefs in the dangers of smoking are 
correlated with acculturation (more acculturated = beliefs that smoking is 
dangerous). http://users.dickinson.edu/~helwegm/abstracts.html 

Marie

Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor l Department of Psychology
Kaufman 168 l Dickinson College
Phone 717.245.1562 l Fax 717.245.1971
http://users.dickinson.edu/~helwegm/index.html



-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Clark [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Smoking Ad and Cognitive Dissonance

Hi

In Canada, it is not one moment of intervention in that cigarette packs are 
required to carry horrific images (e.g., images of cancer victims in last 
stages, diseased tongues) and messages, now covering 3/4s of the pack.  Of 
course that intervention is not as dynamic as a video either.  And then the 
cost is also a deterrent and there are school programs; so difficult to 
attribute cause for decline in smoking among Canadians.

In Greece, some people (smokers) we talk to (Greeks, Albanians) appear to NOT 
believe that smoking is harmful.  A more systematic survey might prove 
otherwise, of course.

Take care
Jim


James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected]

>>> "Helweg-Larsen, Marie" <[email protected]> 22-Jun-12 1:46 AM >>>
My research is on smoking risk perceptions. The mechanism here is not really 
explained by cognitive dissonance but by optimistic bias. Smokers know that it 
is dangerous to smoke. They also believe that children or young adults should 
not smoke and they wish they had not started themselves. However, they also 
believe that smoking is not that bad (at least not as bad as non-smokers and 
researchers think it is) and most importantly that they are exempt from the 
negative consequences of smoking. So they think that bad things might happen to 
other smokers but not to themselves. 

So the children (in the video) remind the smokers that they too are vulnerable. 
Overwhelmingly those types of "you're at risk too" interventions are quite 
ineffective. Despite years of research no interventions have actually decreased 
this optimistic bias (for smokers or other risks). There are many factors that 
change the optimistic bias (such as personal experience with negative outcomes) 
but generally "lecturing", explaining or perspective taking has no effect. I 
imagine that many of these smokers will take a moment to reflect on why they 
would not recommend smoking to others (especially children), but then proceed 
with smoking. Of course smoking is highly addictive so one moment of 
intervention would be unlikely to have much effect anyway.
Marie


Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor l Department of Psychology Kaufman 168 l Dickinson College 
Phone 717.245.1562 l Fax 717.245.1971 
http://users.dickinson.edu/~helwegm/index.html 



-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Carter [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Smoking Ad and Cognitive Dissonance

I have a dim recollection of a study (described in the 1st edition of Mynatt & 
Doherty) in which the researchers had smokers describe the bad effects of 
smoking, and there were measurable decreases in smoking 6 months out -- and I'm 
assuming there was a debrief (although if an old study, there might not have 
been).

I wish I still had a copy of the 1st edition; it's better than the 2nd....

Does anyone else recall such a study?  I'll look it up and see if there was a 
debrief.

m

--
Marc Carter, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Behavioral and Health Sciences College of Arts & Sciences 
Baker University
--

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Clark [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:14 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Smoking Ad and Cognitive Dissonance
>
> Hi
>
> Sounds like it would take a study to answer this question, no?
>
> I'm always dismayed when I see "contests" for the best anti-whatever 
> ads, sometimes solicited from high school students.  The government 
> then adopts them, without determining empirically whether or not they 
> are actually effective or, even worse, whether they actually promote 
> the behavior they are trying to limit.
>
> Take care
> Jim
>
>
>
> James M. Clark
> Professor of Psychology
> 204-786-9757
> 204-774-4134 Fax
> [email protected]
>
> >>> Michael Britt <[email protected]> 21-Jun-12 7:50 AM >>>
> In this very interesting ad designed to get people to stop smoking 
> they use a tactic where they have innocent little children holding a 
> cigarette go up to smokers and ask for a light.  The smokers are taken 
> aback to say the least and they (at least the ones in the video) talk 
> to the kids about how bad smoking is.  It looks like a very good idea
> - get people to convince others that smoking is bad and thereby induce 
> cognitive dissonance between their actions (smoking) and what they say.
>
> http://www.wimp.com/smokingads/
>
> But: I think they ruin the potential of the attempt by having the 
> children then give the smokers a small piece of paper that essentially 
> explains that they were trying to get them to change their habit (and 
> the note gives them a stop smoking hotline number).  The note reveals 
> that the whole thing was a set-up. Doesn't this allow the smoker to 
> dismiss the whole thing entirely?  I think the idea would have been 
> more effective if the kids had not revealed the manipulation attempt.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Michael
>
> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
> [email protected]
> http://www.ThePsychFiles.com
> Twitter: mbritt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720 
> c
> 9&n=T&l=tips&o=18537
> or send a blank email to leave-18537-
> [email protected] 
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13029.76c7c563b32ad9d8d09c72a2d17c90 
> e
> 1&n=T&l=tips&o=18538
> or send a blank email to leave-18538-
> [email protected] 

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by Baker University ("BU") and is intended to be confidential and for 
the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be 
protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal 
rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify Baker University by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a4468797f&n=T&l=tips&o=18539
 
or send a blank email to 
leave-18539-13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a44687...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=18563
 
or send a blank email to 
leave-18563-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a4468797f&n=T&l=tips&o=18566
or send a blank email to 
leave-18566-13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a44687...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=18567
or send a blank email to 
leave-18567-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to