This is a style of course construction that I follow now that still includes some form of lectures:

1) Computer-mediation: Everything is stored in a course within Blackboard. I have written some programs using Livecode that provide for demonstrations and interactive lab exercises. (see Windows version: http://www.learnpsychology.com/courses/spcourse/Limulus.exe; Mac version: http://www.learnpsychology.com/courses/spcourse/Limulus.zip). There are many sources for commercial software that do many of the things I programmed.

2) All the course content is divided into sections that students can reasonably study in one week. This includes conventional readings from the text book and/or other sources, all my Powerpoint lectures recorded by me, movies and the interactive software that pertains to the unit. The advantage of recording the lectures is that the student does not have to take it all in within 50min. They can pause, rewind etc. The lecture pace is under their control.

3) The units also contain a test on the material that is taken on-line using test construction and administration tools offered by Blackboard. All the test items I used in the past for midterms and finals were incorporated into these unit tests. I was also able to add many more questions since the tests were not packed into a single testing session. I also don't waste class time giving tests. The students can take the tests when they finish studying a unit at any point in the course. They must have them all done by the end of the course.

4) The classes are now filled with questions, discussion, interactive lab exercises and a short presentation like a TED talk that most often include clinical cases, sometimes I present movies segments from the units as a way to start discussions. They are also given a short, on-line quiz on the interactive exercises by the end of the class. They can't take the quiz if they don't come to class. This serves as some incentive to come to class.

During the exercise on Limulus, I show a short video on horseshoe crabs. Their great breeding event at the full moon is nearby in Delaware. Did you know that their blood is blue and based on Copper, not Iron (kind of like Vulcans)? They were also used to study vision etc. This is how Lateral Inhibition works in a horseshoe crab - then we go into the short Limulus interactive program. The quiz includes relatively easy items on Lateral Inhibition and the location of Cape Henlopen. I usually take the quiz with them and give them the answer if someone doesn't shout it out before me.

5) The students also have the Blackboard discussion forums and email. I find that they do most of the discussion in class.

In short, my lectures are treated like the textbook readings. Classes are now interactive sessions. The course is also more self-paced. Since the tests are "open-book" (even this term is an anachronism - with Google, life is open book), most no longer cram for exams. Since there is never enough time to look up every answer, they must still study to get a good grade. I can also ask questions that are more abstract and require more synthesis. After they take one or two of the tests, they know that they cannot breeze through if they want a good grade.

I think one of the most important elements is that the students have more control over the pace of the course. The pace isn't dictated to them. They probably perceive the class sessions as more interesting since they are doing something. Finally, I don't have the burden of lecturing more than once. All my effort is put into inventing class activities getting them interested in the material. After you do all this once, it becomes far easier to conduct future classes.

Mike Williams

P.S. This course is Sensation & Perception.

On 1/27/13 11:00 PM, Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) digest wrote:
Subject: re: Aren't TED talks just lectures?
From: Annette Taylor<[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:44:46 +0000
X-Message-Number: 2

I just don't get the brou-ha-ha over lectures.

I lecture.

I make no excuses for that.

There is a lot that can be done to make lectures relatively interactive. It's 
not rocket science. The pause for students to think about a question asked 
during a lecture, and then providing a CORRECT answer! the pause for students 
to formulate an answer, maybe a little pair and share, and then solicitation of 
the responses. I use lots of embedded demos, especially in cognitive. It does 
not have to be 100% delivery, but for most of my classes I'd say it's about 80% 
delivery with short film clips, demos and embedded questions.

Let's face it, discovery learning does not work especially well. Students are 
are likely, if not more likely, to hit upon a wrong answer and then convince 
their classmates of the wrong information. Go back and check the archives for 
many of Hake's postings for evidence to that effect.

Students who are learning new stuff and have minimal background need lecture. 
Ours is not a very hands-on discipline. It's important that they understand HOW 
we reached the conclusions we have reached, which is what we are teaching--the 
conclusions.

So what's wrong with lecture? I'm tired of the black and white painting of 
course pedagogies. It's all in how you do any of them. Look at the discussions 
of powerpoint. It's not powerpoint that is inherently bad. I think it's great! 
One of the primary things that attracts our attention is motion, so that 
presenting things that appear one by one captures attention. It's a matter of 
what it is that appears that is important.

So I lecture and I use powerpoint. There. I'm proud of it!

Annette


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23333
or send a blank email to 
leave-23333-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to