Dear Ken and Tipsters,

Radiologists "had up to three minutes to freely scroll through each of 5 lung 
CTs, searching for modules as we tracked their eyes." They clicked module 
locations with a mouse.  The gorilla was entered on the final trial.

The naïve observers were given 10 minutes teaching about now to identify 
modules then completed the same task as above.

Note that afterwards everyone was asked if they noticed anything unusual when 
re-exposed to the gorilla slide. Everyone saw it.

Sincerely,

Stuart


___________________________________________________________________________
                                   "Floreat Labore"

                                                      
            "Recti cultus pectora roborant"
                                      
Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,     Phone: 819 822 9600 x 2402 
Department of Psychology,         Fax: 819 822 9661
Bishop's University,
2600 rue College,
Sherbrooke,
Québec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.
 
E-mail: [email protected] (or [email protected])

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page: 
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy    

                         Floreat Labore"

                             


___________________________________________________________________________



-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Steele [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: February 15, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Inattention blindness in radiologists


Hi Stuart:

This is a follow-up to Stephen Black's point that the radiologists were looking 
for cancer signs and not for other irrelevant images.

What were the instructions that the radiologists and the controls were given?


Ken

---------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  [email protected]
Professor
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------


On 2/14/2013 4:38 PM, Stuart McKelvie wrote:
> Dear TIPSTERS,
>
> I held back on this until I had some facts.
>
> The immediate question that came to mind was "If 83% of radiologists did not 
> see the gorilla, what was the rate for non-radiologists?"
>
> That is, was there a control group.
>
> Dr. Drew has kindly supplied me with a preprint of his manuscript and here 
> are the facts:
>
> Of 24 radiologists, 20 failed to detect the gorilla.
> Of 24 non-radiologists, 24 failed to detect the gorilla.
>
> Now that puts a different spin on what I have heard all over the media.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Stuart
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>                                     "Floreat Labore"
>
>
>              "Recti cultus pectora roborant"
>
> Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,     Phone: 819 822 9600 x 2402
> Department of Psychology,         Fax: 819 822 9661
> Bishop's University,
> 2600 rue College,
> Sherbrooke,
> Québec J1M 1Z7,
> Canada.
>
> E-mail: [email protected] (or [email protected])
>
> Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
> http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
>
>                           Floreat Labore"
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
>


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13510.2cc18398df2e6692fffc29a610cb72e3&n=T&l=tips&o=23745
or send a blank email to 
leave-23745-13510.2cc18398df2e6692fffc29a610cb7...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23748
or send a blank email to 
leave-23748-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to