This will have no impact since investigators are not represented in
AAHRPP or PRIMR. These organizations are sustained by more and more
regulations. They ignore the interests of investigators and essentially
treat investigators like they are all intent on harming subjects. It is
a real "them vs us" attitude and there is essentially no check on their
behavior. If there is one thing that the Republicans got right is that
when you create regulations, you great and industry and special interest
that feeds off supporting them.
http://www.primr.org/
http://www.aahrpp.org/
Mike Williams
On 3/7/13 12:00 AM, Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) digest
wrote:
Subject: AAUP recommends more researcher autonomy in IRB reform | Inside Higher
Ed
From: Christopher Green<[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:02:04 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1
A very interesting development in the history of the IRB.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/03/06/aaup-recommends-more-researcher-autonomy-irb-reform
Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
[email protected]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=24167
or send a blank email to
leave-24167-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
