Well, Mike, the "two track" system was proposed by in Ernest Boyer in 
"Scholarship Reconsidered."  But, in a true vision of equality between teacher 
and scholar, not a "separate but equal" academic Jim Crow-ism.

Make it a good day

-Louis-


Louis Schmier                                   
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       
203 E. Brookwood Pl                         http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Valdosta, Ga 31602 
(C)  229-630-0821                             /\   /\  /\                 /\    
 /\
                                                      /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   
/   \  /   \
                                                     /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ 
/\/  /  \    /\  \
                                                   //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/   
 \_/__\  \
                                             /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                         _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" - /   \_

On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Mike Palij wrote:

>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I'll see Chris Green's modest proposal and raise you a class system
> for academics.   There's an opinion piece in the NY Times by the
> Wharton psychology Adam Grant from which the Subject line is
> taken (doncha know? It's tenured professors and not increasing
> number of administrators that ills academia); see:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/06/opinion/a-solution-for-bad-teaching.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140206&_r=0
>  
> I believe that the point behind the article is that we create two tracks:
> one for professors who can get tenure through teaching and one
> for professors who can get tenure through research -- unstated but
> I assume, research professors would mentor graduate students and
> the occasional undergraduate because, you know, they need cheap
> labor to run a lab).  Of course, these two groups of professors would
> be separate but equal, with teachers getting ever larger classes while
> researchers (if they can get the grant money) will get greater shares
> of real estate, higher pay (supplements from grants), and coverage
> of other costs (e.g., travel to conferences, publication, equipments,
> etc.).
>  
> Sounds like a great idea!
>  
> [If you respond "Yes" to the above statement, you missed the sarcasm].
>  
> -Mike Palij
> New York University
> [email protected]
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=931223.50b956e1f0f315eddcd01dfbd8b87bc1&n=T&l=tips&o=33973
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-33973-931223.50b956e1f0f315eddcd01dfbd8b87...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=33974
or send a blank email to 
leave-33974-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to