On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 05:26:55 -0800, Louis Eugene Schmier wrote:
Well, Mike, the "two track" system was proposed by in Ernest Boyer in
"Scholarship Reconsidered."
I did not mean to imply the "two track" system was original with Adam
Grant and, though I could not cite a source, I was pretty sure that it
may have been tried in various formats at different universities over
the
years. However, the need to bring in extra money to the school, often
in the form of indirect costs from administering grants, will put the
grant
getters in a better position in academia (i.e., administratively,
economically,
status, power, etc.). Money talks. Money dominates.
But, in a true vision of equality between teacher
and scholar, not a "separate but equal" academic Jim Crow-ism.
I don't see how this is possible unless a school has an endowment
that specifically says that it supposed to be used for attaining and
maintaining the highest levels of teaching and educational experience.
Few sources support that. There are a lot of sources that will put
in seed money and cover continuing costs especially if patentably
product or other lucrative products are produced. Money changes
everything (see: Sports, College).
Make it a good day
Make it an A-1 day.
-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=33976
or send a blank email to
leave-33976-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
