And all of this implies a newly minted coin.

On Mar 2, 2015, at 8:29 AM, John Kulig <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's my understanding that the head side has just a touch more surface area 
> because of the beveled edge (i.e. they are not perfect rectangles viewed from 
> the side). That would have been a better way for me to say it (i.e. beveled 
> edge). Sorry for my poor choice of words 
> 
> https://www.cointalk.com/threads/pennies-beveled-edges.111533/
> 
> ==========================
> John W. Kulig, Ph.D.
> Professor of Psychology
> Coordinator, Psychology Honors
> Plymouth State University 
> Plymouth NH 03264 
> ==========================
> 
> From: "Jim Clark" <[email protected]>
> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 9:17:23 AM
> Subject: RE: [tips] Are coin tosses random?
> 
> 
> If the head side is larger (heavier?), shouldn’t it come up tails?
>  
> Jim
>  
> Jim Clark
> Professor & Chair of Psychology
> University of Winnipeg
> 204-786-9757
> Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
> www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
>  
> From: John Kulig [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 8:10 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Are coin tosses random?
>  
> As a practical demo of a related issue, stand a few pennies on their edge (I 
> would alternate which side heads is on) on a table and shake or tap the table 
> and most will come up heads due to the fact that the head side of a penny is 
> ever so slightly larger than the tail side, hence has a very slight 
> preexisting tilt (that's what I have read .. I have not microscopically 
> examined them). But I have done it with pennies and if done carefully it is 
> very easy to demonstrate p<.05 :-) a value very different that 50%. A 
> physicist friend once explained how coins spun have a bias (slight) for tails.
>  
> And I have usually regarded random as ignorance ,,,
>  
> ==========================
> John W. Kulig, Ph.D.
> Professor of Psychology
> Coordinator, Psychology Honors
> Plymouth State University 
> Plymouth NH 03264 
> ==========================
>  
> From: "Wuensch, Karl L" <[email protected]>
> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:01:21 PM
> Subject: RE: [tips] Are coin tosses random?
>  
>  
>  
>           Philosophically this issue is more important.  Does “random” just 
> mean ignorance of the mechanisms involved in determining the outcome (and 
> ignorance of the current states of those mechanisms).  In the absence of 
> ignorance, would anything be random?
>  
> Cheers,
> <image001.jpg>
> From: Jeffry Ricker, Ph.D. [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 3:37 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Are coin tosses random?
>  
>  
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:28 PM, Jim Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
> One lesson I take away from Jeff`s original post (i.e., that even a simple 
> coin toss probability is a challenge to determine) is that we should not 
> worry too much by such minutia as whether all the abstract assumptions for 
> statistical tests are met. The real world is so messy that such contributions 
> to the correctness of our conclusions are probably minimal and in an 
> uncertain direction.
>  
> Yes, that's an excellent point. I also was thinking about several other 
> issues that these studies might help to clarify for students.
>  
> One is the issue of internal versus external validity (and yes, ecological 
> validity also could be mentioned, although that isn't what concerns me with 
> coin tossing).
>  
> Based on what I was able to understand of their conclusions, both groups of 
> researchers seemed to be stating that their findings had high internal 
> validity, but they didn't think they would generalize to the types of 
> situations in which coins typically are tossed.
>  
> I thought this would be an easy–to–understand example to use when I discuss 
> validity—as long as I leave the math out!!!
>  
> Best,
>  
>  
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jeffry Ricker, Ph.D.
> Professor of Psychology

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=42419
or send a blank email to 
leave-42419-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to