The problem would be finding a metric of teaching effectiveness that’s 
independent of teacher performance to use in validating teacher performance as 
a measure.

And is ‘student retention’ an educational issue or a financial one?
Or for that matter a medical one?

My official position on student evaluation is that students should be evaluated 
frequently and rigorously.


On Apr 4, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Jeffry Ricker, Ph.D. <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> We all know about the controversy surrounding the use of student course 
> evaluations to rate instructors’ teaching. But with the current emphasis on 
> student retention  (e.g., the percentage of first-semester Freshmen who 
> enroll in second-semester classes), I’m seeing the emergence of a new metric 
> to rate and compare instructors: the percentage of "successful completions” 
> (the percentage of students earning a final grade of C or better) in their 
> classes. 
> 
> Many studies of first-year students have shown that successful completion of 
> courses is a primary correlate of retention. The funding of public colleges 
> often is based on formulas that use the total number of credit hours being 
> taken at a college to estimate the number of  "full-time student 
> equivalents”(or something similar). It’s easier to increase this by retaining 
> the students you already have than by attracting new students. And with 
> decreasing state funding of higher education (in Arizona, annual state 
> funding for our community college district will be $0—yes, that’s a 
> zero—beginning July 1st), many colleges are scrambling to increase retention.
> 
> Thus, some (many? most? all?) colleges are examining data on successful 
> completions, and even breaking it down so that one can compare different 
> instructors teaching a particular course. For example, yesterday, I found 
> data on my college’s site showing, by semester, the number of “successful 
> completers” in each section of introductory psychology for at least the last 
> seven years. I suspect that administrators at many colleges are looking more 
> and more closely at these data as the financial situations at their 
> institutions worsen.
> 
> So my question: is there research that looks at the validity of using 
> successful completion data to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of 
> individual instructors? I’m having a bit of trouble finding good research on 
> this. Cn anyone help?
> 
> Best,
> Jeff
> 
> P.S. And by the way, I’m asking because it seems likely that a major confound 
> would be differences among instructors in expectations and standards (i.e., 
> rigor of the course), even when they all are teaching a course that is 
> nominally the same.

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=43616
or send a blank email to 
leave-43616-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to