Chris, I rest my case.

Make it a good day

-Louis-


Louis Schmier                                   
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       
203 E. Brookwood Pl                         http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Valdosta, Ga 31602 
(C)  229-630-0821                             /\   /\  /\                 /\    
 /\
                                                      /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   
/   \  /   \
                                                     /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ 
/\/  /  \    /\  \
                                                   //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/   
 \_/__\  \
                                             /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                         _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" - /   \_

On May 6, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Christopher Green wrote:

> On May 6, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Louis Eugene Schmier <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>>      You know, sometimes I hate Isaac Newton, or, at least, his devotees who 
>> advocated that everything is a machine and is governed by intelligible, 
>> universal, and immutable laws.  I say this because the scholarship of 
>> teaching and learning has turned the classroom in a Newtonian pedagogically 
>> and technologically mechanical system.
> 
> I usually ignore Louis far-too-long and not-particularly-enlightening 
> ruminations on his life as a “real” teacher. But this particular claim misses 
> the mark by such an enormous distance that I feel I have to comment. Whether 
> some overly-excited science “boosters” like to speculate that “everything” is 
> governed by mechanical laws is not really the point. The point is that there 
> is far too great tendency among far too many people to presume, on the 
> contrary, that everything that is the slightest bit complicated (which is 
> pretty much everything) is somehow “mystical” or “divine” or otherwise beyond 
> human comprehension. The mechanist program says only, “Let’s see which of 
> these phenomena we can explain in a mechanist fashion. For any phenomenon we 
> can model in that way, there is no longer a need to regard it as being 
> ‘mystical.' For those things that we cannot model mechanically at present, 
> the question of how it works remains open.” Thus, the famous line from 
> Laplace, when asked by Napoleon about the absence of God in his model of the 
> cosmos: “I have no need of that hypothesis.” 
> 
> Now, to be sure, there are lots of people saying lots of stupid things about 
> education these days, and offering (for sale, note) various contraptions that 
> purport to “solve” the “problem.” The issue here, however, has far more to do 
> with P. T. Barnum than it does with Isaac Newton (viz., “There’s a sucker 
> born every minute.”). Or worse yet, the politicians who over-ride the wisdom 
> of actual educators to impose these devices on the classroom (if even a 
> classroom remains) are having their campaigns financed by the very people who 
> are hoping to make a buck by replacing real teachers with their devices. That 
> is the problem. Not Netwon and not mechanism.
> 
> In short, Louis, you have been badly diverted from the real issue, which is 
> exactly their intent. 
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> …..
> Christopher D Green
> Department of Psychology
> York University
> Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
> Canada
> 
> [email protected]
> http://www.yorku.ca/christo
> ………………………………...
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=931223.50b956e1f0f315eddcd01dfbd8b87bc1&n=T&l=tips&o=44565
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-44565-931223.50b956e1f0f315eddcd01dfbd8b87...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=44566
or send a blank email to 
leave-44566-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to