Hi All, (Adding the TLS wg list, just in case.)
I think this is fine and IANA should allocate a codepoint as requested. Cheers, S. On 02/02/16 23:50, John Bradley wrote: > > The Tokbind WG would like to ask for an early allocation of an IANA > code point for the "TLS Extension for Token Binding Protocol > Negotiation" > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-02 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-02>). > This document defines a new TLS extension "token_binding", which > needs to be added to the IANA "Transport Layer Security (TLS) > Extensions" registry. > > Please note that this document also seeks to establish a registry for > identifiers of Token Binding key parameters entitled "Token Binding > Key Parameters" under the "Token Binding Protocol" heading. This new > registry is not part of the early assignment request. > > At this point, authors do not expect major changes in the "TLS > Extension for Token Binding Protocol Negotiation" specification. > There are at least two prototype implementations of this > specification being worked on (by Google and Microsoft). An early > IANA code point assignment would facilitate implementation and > deployment experience prior to the publication of the RFC. > > Regards John Bradley > > > > _______________________________________________ Unbearable mailing > list [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
