Thanks. On Feb 3, 2016 9:47 PM, "Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi All, > > (Adding the TLS wg list, just in case.) > > I think this is fine and IANA should allocate a codepoint as > requested. > > Cheers, > S. > > On 02/02/16 23:50, John Bradley wrote: > > > > The Tokbind WG would like to ask for an early allocation of an IANA > > code point for the "TLS Extension for Token Binding Protocol > > Negotiation" > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-02 > > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-02>). > > This document defines a new TLS extension "token_binding", which > > needs to be added to the IANA "Transport Layer Security (TLS) > > Extensions" registry. > > > > Please note that this document also seeks to establish a registry for > > identifiers of Token Binding key parameters entitled "Token Binding > > Key Parameters" under the "Token Binding Protocol" heading. This new > > registry is not part of the early assignment request. > > > > At this point, authors do not expect major changes in the "TLS > > Extension for Token Binding Protocol Negotiation" specification. > > There are at least two prototype implementations of this > > specification being worked on (by Google and Microsoft). An early > > IANA code point assignment would facilitate implementation and > > deployment experience prior to the publication of the RFC. > > > > Regards John Bradley > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Unbearable mailing > > list [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable > > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
