Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> writes: >it doesn't explain where this "RSA-SHA-256" is used. IMHO it is ambiguous. > >The "no MAC truncation" is also not explicit about what the sizes should be.
Well can you suggest some wording? I can't see how much more unambiguous a statement like "no MAC truncation" can be. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
