On Tuesday 22 March 2016 10:45:32 Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 22 March 2016 at 06:40, Hubert Kario <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Only in theory, in practice you can do most of the same things in
> > GET's as you can in POSTs.
> > 
> > in other words, basically web frameworks can be made to modify
> > server
> > state upon receiving GET request
> 
> Ahh yes, but it's not the *client's* fault if the server does that and
> the client tries multiple times.  The server is entirely responsible
> for the consequences of state modification at that point.

true, but that means that a blanket statement like "Sending GET requests 
in 0-RTT data is safe" is untrue.
-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to