Since draft 17 has been posted, could we now resume this TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0 discussion?
Xiaoyin From: Sean Turner<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:31 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [TLS] how close are we? > On Oct 11, 2016, at 23:21, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Xiaoyin Liu <[email protected]> writes: > >> Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> >> TLS 2.0" >> discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as "keeping >> the current name"? > > The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least > those who > contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3. I was kinda > surprised > to see it still being referred to as 1.3. > > Peter. It’s still in the queue. The chairs felt it best to focus on the open technical issues. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
