On Monday, 17 October 2016 17:34:05 CEST Kyle Nekritz wrote:
> Allowing new non-fatal alerts to be added later
> would require that existing clients ignore unknown warning alerts, which I
> think is somewhat dangerous.

but the standard doesn't say that you need to ignore unknown warning level 

it says that any unknown alerts, irrespective of their level MUST be 
considered fatal
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purky┼łova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

TLS mailing list

Reply via email to