On Monday, 17 October 2016 17:34:05 CEST Kyle Nekritz wrote: > Allowing new non-fatal alerts to be added later > would require that existing clients ignore unknown warning alerts, which I > think is somewhat dangerous.
but the standard doesn't say that you need to ignore unknown warning level alerts it says that any unknown alerts, irrespective of their level MUST be considered fatal -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
