Hi list,
I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we
(ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current
specification.
We are sorry for the multiple long messages.
If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be
glad to propose some PRs.
= 0-RTT =
In 4.2.8 (P.47), the server receiving early_data "can behave in one of
two ways"... followed by three cases. Beside the typo, the first case
could be phrased differently. Actually, it reads
- Ignore the extension and return no response. This indicates that
the server has ignored any early data and an ordinary 1-RTT
handshake is required.
Since an ordinary 1-RTT handshake will require the server to actually
send a response (the ServerHello), it might be better to put it this
way:
- Ignore the extension and return a standard 1-RTT ServerHello.
This indicates that the server has ignored any early data and
an ordinary 1-RTT handshake is required.
Olivier Levillain
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls