Hi list, I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we (ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current specification.
We are sorry for the multiple long messages. If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be glad to propose some PRs. = 0-RTT = In 4.2.8 (P.47), the server receiving early_data "can behave in one of two ways"... followed by three cases. Beside the typo, the first case could be phrased differently. Actually, it reads - Ignore the extension and return no response. This indicates that the server has ignored any early data and an ordinary 1-RTT handshake is required. Since an ordinary 1-RTT handshake will require the server to actually send a response (the ServerHello), it might be better to put it this way: - Ignore the extension and return a standard 1-RTT ServerHello. This indicates that the server has ignored any early data and an ordinary 1-RTT handshake is required. Olivier Levillain _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls