On Friday, 2 December 2016 13:47:20 CET Salz, Rich wrote: > > People already know that SSL3 is worse than "SSL" 1.0 though 1.2 , it's > > logical that SSL 1.3 continues that trend. creating "SSL" 4 will bring > > more confusion. > > Please explain that assertion.
SSL 2 < SSL 3 < "SSL" 1.0 < "SSL" 1.1 < "SSL" 1.2 < "SSL" 4 is not logical ordering -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls