Hi Andreas, We dropped that draft as there was not much interest in the community for the same. We will be glad to revive it incase if there is enough interest in the community.
Regards, Jay On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > Andreas, > > DTLS 1.3 will behave this way by default, so it would be better to just > move to 1.3 rather than patching 1.2. > > -Ekr > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Andreas Walz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I stumbled upon an expired draft introducing a new (D)TLS extension to >> omit explicit nonces in (D)TLS AEAD cipher modes >> (draft-jay-tls-omit-aead-explicit-nonce-extension). For a number of >> cipher suites, this would allow to reduce the per-record overhead in (D)TLS >> by 8 bytes. >> >> Is there any interest in breathing new life into that draft? In our >> scenario (DTLS for a legacy industrial wireless communication system) every >> single byte counts. That is why we would strongly support reviving this >> draft... >> >> Thanks and Cheers, >> Andi Walz >> >> >> ___________________________________ >> >> Andreas Walz >> Research Engineer >> Institute of reliable Embedded Systems and Communication Electronics >> (ivESK) >> Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, 77652 Offenburg, Germany >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
