On Sun 2017-07-16 12:44:04 +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 01:23:35PM +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> > Not to mention the security & troubleshooting applications which
>> > require insight into the cryptostream on the wire.
>>
>> I asked for examples of regulations that specifically require plaintext
>> from the network.
>
> Some countries has got that kind of requirements in the lawful
> interception context, in the sense that monitoring is explicitly
> required to be fully passive.
Could you point me (and the list) to those requirements, please? More
specificity than "some countries" would be a useful contribution to this
discussion.
> However, this mostly means "network equipment that supports some kind
> of encryption on the link should be able to pass the traffic in
> plaintext for monitoring purposes".
Is this quote taken from a specific regulatory context? or do the
quotation marks indicate paraphrasing or something else?
Regards,
--dkg
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
