Hi Rich (and Tony Rutkowski == hot_middlebox I assume?) On 14/03/18 22:17, Salz, Rich wrote: > * The requirements for visibility exist in an array of regulated > environments worldwide. It is one of the presentation areas in the Hot > Middlebox Workshop. > http://www.etsi.org/etsi-security-week-2018/middlebox-security?tab=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.etsi.org_etsi-2Dsecurity-2Dweek-2D2018_middlebox-2Dsecurity-3Ftab-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Yz_0b8nsA9CDyOxIGLCsjdmfsbcx2aanAH-oeuvMpkk&s=NW0inE5_1gzb4brUZGMm47dZyrYtkYXtAXf7Ii6S8kk&e=> > > Do you know if they require packet traces to be decoded, or if one of the > nodes can just log the traffic? Do they require this to be true for traffic > over the public Internet or just within an enterprise? > >
I see no content at that URL. This seems to be another case of claiming regulations exist but yet again being unable to point to any such regulation that others can read. (And yes, we did this before for PCI-DSS so let's not repeat that if there's no new information offered.) S. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
0x7B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
