On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
I don't really agree with that characterization. To state my understanding, as responsible AD, of the status of this document: this document is in the RFC Editor's queue being processed.
That was a process mistake. 1) ekr filed a DISCUSS 2) other people raised issues in response 3) ekr's DISCUSS was resolved but not the other people's concern 4) document was placed in RFC Editor queue despite this 5) TLS consensus call done on the list 6) here we are.... I think it is not good to use this process as a way of approving things. A process mistake was made. Paul _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
