On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 06:32:32PM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote: > I wrote: > > >Now that RFC 8447 is published, I'd like to request the addition of extension > >ID 26 for TLS-LTS: > > > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-tls-lts/ > > > >This extension has been waiting for quite some time for the publication of > >8447, so it's already in use by implementations. > > As per RFC 8447, I requested allocation of extension ID 26 for TLS-LTS on 20 > August. The RFC says: > > Specification Required [RFC8126] registry requests are registered after a > three-week review period > > It's now been more than the three weeks listed in the RFC, what happens now? > Can I list the extension as allocated in the LTS draft?
Most certainly not! I quote: Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the <[email protected]> mailing list) for resolution. -Ben _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
