Hi all, We've registered the following TLS ExtensionType Value:
Value: 26 Extension Name: tls_lts TLS 1/3: - Recommended: N Reference: [draft-gutmann-tls-lts] Please see https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values Our preference is that the contents of the "TLS 1.3" and "Recommended" fields be added to the IANA Considerations section. Best regards, Amanda Baber Lead IANA Services Specialist On Wed Oct 03 16:28:46 2018, [email protected] wrote: > Yoav and I (two of the three designated experts) approve the > assignment of 26 for TLS-LTS. > > Sorry for the delays in getting the workflow worked out, Peter. > > > On 9/25/18, 2:32 PM, "Peter Gutmann" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Now that RFC 8447 is published, I'd like to request the addition of > > extension > > ID 26 for TLS-LTS: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-tls-lts/ > > > > This extension has been waiting for quite some time for the > > publication of > > 8447, so it's already in use by implementations. > > As per RFC 8447, I requested allocation of extension ID 26 for TLS-LTS > on 20 > August. The RFC says: > > Specification Required [RFC8126] registry requests are registered > after a > three-week review period > > It's now been more than the three weeks listed in the RFC, what > happens now? > Can I list the extension as allocated in the LTS draft? > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
