>Can you point to specific drafts where *normative* references are only >available for paying a fee? I guess that there are some, but I don’t know of >any. This is one example: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8428.txt [RNC]; ISO/IEC, "Information technology -- Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) -- Part 2: Regular-grammar-based validation -- RELAX NG", ISO/IEC 19757-2, Annex C: RELAX NG Compact syntax, December 2008. Kind Regards Kepeng
-------------------------- 发件人:Salz, Rich<[email protected]> 日期：8月16日 23:06 收件人：Kepeng Li<[email protected]> 输入主题Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3 >How does the other IETF drafts make the references to ISO documents? ISO >documents are often referenced by IETF drafts. Can you point to specific drafts where *normative* references are only available for paying a fee? I guess that there are some, but I don’t know of any. Your claim implies definitive knowledge, however. In general, the IETF tends to dislike using standards where the specification is not freely available in English. That last part, in English, is perhaps narrow-minded these days, but the IETF works in English. Also, note that I said “tends to dislike” and didn’t claim a hard rule always enforced. In the past, where there have been issues, it has been not uncommon to write internet-drafts and publish through CFRG; see https://datatracker.ietf.org/rg/cfrg/documents/ for many examples. Sometimes they are published as individual stream RFC’s; see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7091 for a highly applicable example.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
