> On Oct 2, 2019, at 12:23, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > On Wednesday, 2 October 2019 13:18:07 CEST Hubert Kario wrote: >> On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 17:01:54 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:27 AM John Mattsson <john.mattsson= >>> >>> 40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>> Dan Brown <danibr...@blackberry.com> wrote: >>>>> ANSI X9.62-2005 was withdrawn in 2015 >>>> >>>> Ok, that TLS 1.3 is relying on a withdrawn publication that used to be >>>> behind a paywall is even worse. >>> >>> Ugh. >>> >>>>> Also, I expect FIPS 186-5 is nearly ready, and will specify much of >>>> >>>> ECDSA >>>> >>>> That NIST FIPS 186-5 will include all the details needed to implement >>>> ECDSA is great. >>>> >>>>> IETF has specs for sigs and their formats already, no? >>>> >>>> At the time when RFC 8446 was published, there was probably no quick and >>>> easy solution to the problem. But the fact that IETF has historically >>>> been >>>> fine with relying on specifications behind paywalls is part of the >>>> problem. >>>> If IETF had implemented a strong open-access policy a long-time ago, >>>> there >>>> would probably be an open-access version of ECDSA (NIST or IETF) a long >>>> time ago.. >>> >>> I agree with you about the policy here. To be honest, I just didn't notice >>> this; and it would probably need some github spelunking to figure out the >>> history of these references. >>> >>> If someone wanted to propose an erratum that would fix this, I would be >>> very appreciative. >> >> I just did propose an erratum for that. > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5868
On the 5480 vs 4492 reference. 4492 is also in the DOWNREF registry so it’s okay on that front, but three’s no ASN.1 module. That ASN.;1 come from the ASNI X9.62 spec. I have a slight preference to refer to 5480 and just add the reference. spt
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
