> On Oct 2, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> wrote:
>
> Asking for one upon resumption seems reasonable to me. Thanks to you and
> Viktor for bringing up this case!
Thanks! Much appreciated.
My other point, which I probably obscured in too many words, is
that a client that prefers to re-use existing tickets, would
normally want to ask for 0 new tickets, but this should not
necessarily preclude the server from issuing one *as needed*
(STEK rollover, ...).
So there is a difference between a signal that tickets
are simply not wanted, vs. wanted only *as needed*.
Do you have any thoughts on how a client might signal this?
The use-case is clients and servers that don't make use of
early-data, and don't need to avoid traffic analysis. For
example, MTA-to-MTA traffic, where the client even identifies
in clear text with "EHLO". Here ticket reuse is the norm,
and renewal is only needed as tickets age.
[ I hope I managed an suitably concise description this time... ]
--
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
