On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 22/10/2019 19:10, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Uh,why? > > Openness, transparency, enabling the WG to make decisions on > the list. The WG has the chance to make decisions on the list *in response to* proposals in the draft. At this stage of the draft development, I don't think it's problematic for authors to put proposals in a draft with the understanding that they are proposals. Eventually, we'll need to enter a "no changes without consensus" phase, but I don't think it's at all obvious that that's true yet. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
