On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM Stephen Farrell < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 22/10/2019 19:10, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> > Uh,why? >> >> Openness, transparency, enabling the WG to make decisions on >> the list. > > > The WG has the chance to make decisions on the list *in response to* > proposals in the draft. At this stage of the draft development, I don't > think it's problematic for authors to put proposals in a draft with the > understanding that they are proposals. Eventually... > This seems fine to me, fwiw. It was a little weird to hear about the decision in this way, but that kind of thing is always happening behind the scenes. :) It seems to me that the client is in the best position to set the padding, so I’m not sure why there is anything in the DNS record. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
