On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 5:54 AM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Building on a point Barry made, I think it would be useful to distinguish > in > the document whether this spec is experimental because we are waiting for > quantum computers to materialize, or whether it is experimental because > current > implementors want to gain more experience with it before standardization. >From my perspective it's experimental because there was very little interest from implementors and we're trying to have more interest before we do standard track protocols. -Ekr That > way if it does come back at some future point on the standards track the > context for why it was experimental in the first place will be there. > > Please respond to the Gen-ART reviewer. > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
