Thank you for your review and to Stephen for making the speedy updates.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 19/01/2021 10:23, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: Yes
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thank you for the work put into this document.
> >
> > Special thanks to the shepherd, Sean Turner, who did a great job to
> describe
> > the WG consensus. Rob Wilton's point about minimum version is also
> important
> > and should be addressed in the abstract (even if the text is clearer in
> section
> > 1).
> >
> > Please find below some nits.
> >
> > I hope that this helps to improve the document,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -éric
> >
> > -- Abstract --
> > "This document, if approved, formally deprecates Transport Layer" =>
> should ",
> > if approved," be removed now from the abstract? The RFC Editor will
> probably do
> > it though.
>
> Yep, that's standard fare so fine to leave as-is since the
> RFC folks know what to do there already.
>
> >
> > -- Section 1 --
> > "deprecate these old versions." should the "these old version" be
> followed by
> > the enumeration ?
>
> Fair enough. I guess that snippet in isolation could be
> ambiguous. Also fixed in repo - [1] with diff vs. -11
> at [2]
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
> [2]
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to