Hi Eric, I agree. Let's get the semantics right. You mentioned a 3-tuple w/ "Discouraged". Should that be "Deprecated" (for clarity)?
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 5:17 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, we certainly can change it in 8446-bis. > > My put here would be: let's get consensus on the *semantics* we want for > the various categories without worrying about the names (call them A, B, C, > etc.) and then we can name them after. > > -Ekr > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 2:14 PM Ira McDonald <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> Thanks for the background. I still sympathize with Hannes' point that >> "Recommended" means "IETF Consensus". I have to explain this >> too often in the insular automotive industry. >> >> But I certainly wouldn't write an RFC to change the title of a single >> column in an IANA registry. I've been one of the Designated Experts >> for the IANA Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) registry for 20 years and >> we rename IANA fields as needed by a direct request to our IANA >> folks (after consensus in the IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group IPP >> WG - successor to IETF IPP WG in the 1990s). >> >> Cheers, >> - Ira >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:18 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Previous discussion is on this issue: >>> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1214 >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> - I am actually not in favor of changing it to IETF Consensus. I >>>> think these have different meanings. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To be clear, I wasn’t expressing an opinion on whether or not to do >>>> this, I was just showing folks how to start the change process. >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
