On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 06:25:39PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> This draft looks good.
>
> One nit, omitted "TLS" before SignatureAlgorithm in two places in
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.html#section-15-3
Would it be appropriate to clarify the status of Ed25519 in DTLS?
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/2019-November/011582.html
and if so, where should such clarification happen? The registry already
marks Ed25519 as "DTLS-OK", but unclear on what basis...
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
